top of page
Writer's pictureDr. Deepessh Divaakaran

Understanding NIRF’s New Sustainability Category: Predictions and Preparations for Institutions

The National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) is set to introduce a new category aligned with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in its 2025 rankings. This initiative reflects a global shift toward environmentally responsible education. Institutions aiming for excellence in this category must start preparing now to align with anticipated parameters in NIRF New Sustainability Category.

Understanding NIRF’s New Sustainability Category: Predictions and Preparations for Institutions
Understanding NIRF’s New Sustainability Category: Predictions and Preparations for Institutions

Based on research into SDGs, QS rankings, and other global standards, we offer insights and predictions on how this category may unfold.

Predicted Weightage and Scoring Model in NIRF’s New Sustainability Category


Our analysis suggests the following distribution of weightage for the Sustainability category:

Sr No

Criteria

Weightage (%)

1

Environmental Resource Management

30%

2

Green Campus Initiatives

20%

3

Research and Innovation

20%

4

Curricular and Co-Curricular Contributions

15%

5

Governance and Transparency

15%


Each parameter will likely contribute to a composite sustainability score, ensuring a balanced evaluation of institutional efforts across diverse criteria.



Predicted Categories and Sub-Criteria in NIRF’s New Sustainability Category


1. Environmental Resource Management (30%)

Institutions will be assessed based on their efficiency in utilizing resources and minimizing waste.

  • Energy Efficiency (10%): % of renewable energy use and energy consumption per square meter.

  • Water Management (10%): % of water recycled and rainwater harvesting capacity.

  • Waste Management (10%): % of waste recycled or composted.


Documentation Checklist:


Energy Efficiency:

  • Electricity bills highlighting renewable energy usage.

  • Certification for renewable energy installations (e.g., solar panels, wind turbines).

  • Energy audit reports for the past 3-5 years.

Water Management:

  • Reports or photographs of rainwater harvesting systems.

  • Records of water recycling processes and usage.

  • Water consumption logs and reduction targets.

Waste Management:

  • Annual waste audit reports.

  • Evidence of waste segregation processes.

  • Agreements with recycling vendors or composting units.


 

2. Green Campus Initiatives (20%)

Evaluates eco-friendly practices on campus, from infrastructure to biodiversity.

  • Green Cover (8%): % of campus area under vegetation.

  • Carbon Footprint Reduction (7%): Emission offsets and use of EVs.

  • Sustainable Infrastructure (5%): Number of green-certified buildings.


Documentation Checklist:


Green Cover:

  • Campus layout map highlighting green zones.

  • Reports on biodiversity projects or tree plantation drives.

  • Drone footage or satellite imagery of campus vegetation.

Carbon Footprint Reduction:

  • Emission audit reports (including scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions).

  • Inventory of electric vehicles and other green transport facilities.

  • Receipts or records of carbon offset purchases or programs.

Sustainable Infrastructure:

  • Certifications for green buildings (e.g., LEED, IGBC).

  • Blueprints or architectural designs showcasing sustainable construction.

  • Reports on energy savings achieved through smart systems.


 

3. Research and Innovation (20%)

Measures contributions to sustainability through academic and industry efforts.

  • Research Publications (10%): Number of indexed publications on sustainability topics.

  • Collaborations (5%): Partnerships with organizations focusing on sustainability.

  • Innovations (5%): Patents or projects addressing environmental issues.


Documentation Checklist:


Research Publications:

  • List of research papers published in indexed journals related to sustainability.

  • Citations of published research in Scopus, Web of Science, or similar databases.

Collaborations:

  • Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs) with organizations or industries for sustainability research.

  • Details of funded projects from government or private bodies.

Innovations:

  • Patent certificates for innovations in sustainability.

  • Project reports or prototypes related to sustainability solutions.

  • Awards or recognition for sustainability-related innovations.


 

4. Curricular and Co-Curricular Contributions (15%)

Recognizes integration of sustainability into education and extracurricular activities.

  • Sustainability in Curriculum (8%): % of programs with sustainability-focused courses.

  • Student Initiatives (7%): Number of student-led projects or start-ups related to sustainability.


Documentation Checklist:


Sustainability in Curriculum:

  • Course syllabi highlighting sustainability-focused topics.

  • List of elective courses on climate change, energy efficiency, etc.

  • Records of faculty development programs on sustainability education.

Student Initiatives:

  • Details of student-led green projects or start-ups.

  • Event reports or photographs from eco-club activities.

  • Documentation of participation in national or international green challenges.


 

5. Governance and Transparency (15%)

Evaluates institutional policies and the monitoring of sustainability efforts.

  • Institutional Policies (8%): Presence of a green charter or environmental policy.

  • Public Reporting (7%): Annual sustainability reports published and goals achieved.


Documentation Checklist:


Institutional Policies:

  • Approved environmental policy document or green charter.

  • Minutes of meetings where sustainability goals were discussed.

  • Evidence of implementation of sustainability policies.

Public Reporting:

  • Annual sustainability or environmental impact reports.

  • Web links to publicly available sustainability goals and achievements.

  • Records of third-party audits for sustainability metrics.


 

Implementation Challenges in NIRF’s New Sustainability Category


  1. Data Collection: Institutions need robust systems for tracking energy, water, and waste metrics.

  2. Validation: Independent audits may be required to verify reported data.

  3. Awareness and Training: Faculty and staff need training to align operations with sustainability goals.

  4. Financial Constraints: Smaller institutions may struggle with the cost of implementing green initiatives.



The introduction of a Sustainability category in NIRF rankings represents a significant step toward aligning Indian higher education with global environmental goals. Institutions that start preparing now will not only improve their rankings but also contribute meaningfully to a sustainable future.



PLEASE NOTE: If your institution wants to analyze its sustainability readiness or any other categories and predict its NIRF 2025 ranking using data science techniques, feel free to contact me. Together, we can help your institution excel in this transformative journey toward sustainability.


Disclaimer: This article is based on independent research and analysis. The actual parameters may vary.
Statutory Warning: These predictions are based on our analysis and do not officially represent NIRF.


 

For more information or any assistance, please feel free to contact me in the order of my preference:

WhatsApp: +91 8086 01 5111

Phone: +91 8086 01 5111









Comentarios


Post: Blog2_Post
bottom of page